Fact-Checking Methodology

1. Introduction

The fact-checking methodology describes how Advance.hr approaches the verification of information before content is published. Our goal is to ensure that key claims in our articles are based on reliable sources and that readers can understand the context and significance of the information presented.

2. Purpose and Scope

This methodology applies to all analytical articles, commentaries, and reports that contain factual claims relevant to the understanding of political, economic, social, and cultural topics. Particular attention is given to matters of public interest, international conflicts, and complex processes that require additional verification.

3. Selection of Topics for Verification

Additional fact-checking is carried out especially when:

• a claim has significant consequences for public understanding of a topic
• the information is disputed or contradictory across multiple sources
• claims originate from politically, economically, or ideologically interested circles
• there is suspicion of manipulation, propaganda, or partial presentation of facts

4. Types of Sources and Their Assessment

In fact-checking, we use different types of sources:

• official documents and data from state and international institutions
• relevant international organizations and research institutions
• academic papers, expert analyses, and scientific literature
• reputable media outlets with established editorial practices

Each source is assessed according to its credibility, transparency, track record, and possible interest-based framework.

5. Fact-Checking Process

Fact-checking includes the following steps:

• identifying the key claims in the article
• comparing claims with multiple independent sources
• checking the original context of statements and documents
• verifying dates, figures, and statistical indicators
• assessing whether a claim is complete or taken out of context

6. Use of Experts and Additional Consultations

For complex topics, we may consult experts from relevant fields such as international relations, economics, law, science, or history. Expert opinions and analyses are used as an additional source, with their role and limitations clearly indicated.

7. Presentation of Verified Information

In the final article, we strive to clearly distinguish between:

• factual claims, such as data, figures, and dates
• interpretations and analytical conclusions by the author
• assessments, scenarios, or opinions that are not factual claims

When referring to specific sources, we do so in a way that allows readers to understand where the information comes from.

8. Handling Unverified Information

Information that cannot be confirmed through reliable sources is:

• not published, or
• published with a clear indication that it is an unconfirmed claim, assessment, or statement by one side

We avoid circulating rumors, unverified claims, and information intended solely for sensationalist purposes.

9. Corrections and Updates

If it is later established that a factual claim in published content was inaccurate, incomplete, or wrongly interpreted, a correction is carried out in accordance with our Corrections Policy. Where necessary, the article is updated with new information, with a clear indication that the content has been updated.

10. Transparency Toward Readers

Our goal is for readers to understand how we obtain information and on what basis we make analytical conclusions. We encourage feedback, reports of possible inaccuracies, and dialogue with our audience. In cases of serious doubt, we are prepared to further explain the sources used and the verification methodology.

11. Contact for Fact-Checking Inquiries

Users who have questions or comments related to fact-checking may contact us through the official email addresses or contact form available on the portal. We review all reports seriously and within a reasonable timeframe.